On construct validity: issues of method and measurement.

TitleOn construct validity: issues of method and measurement.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2005
JournalPsychological assessment
Volume17
Issue4
Pagination396-408
ISSN1040-3590
Abstract

Fifty years ago, L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl (1955) advocated for the concept of construct validity, noting that psychologists study hypothetical, inferred entities and that validating measures of such entities involves basic theory testing. Three important developments in clinical assessment following that seminal article are noteworthy. First, clinical research has benefited from greater theoretical integration and subsequent differentiation among related constructs. Second, implementation of ongoing, critical evaluation of all aspects of the construct validity process, including theory development, hypothesis specification, research design, and empirical evaluation, has improved clinical assessment. Third, improvement in evaluating fit between hypotheses and observations has been sought. Improved means of evaluating multitrait, multimethod designs, and ways to increase their clinical representativeness, are one encouraging development. Ongoing efforts to improve the construct validity process reflect the legacy of L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl.

URLhttp://content.apa.org/journals/pas/17/4/396
DOI10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396
Short TitlePsychol Assess
X
Enter your linkblue username.
Enter your linkblue password.
Secure Login

This login is SSL protected

Loading